Zoom Justice

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | May 03, 2021 | 0 Comments

The COVID-19 pandemic has thrust legal practice into the future in many ways. Courts have advanced decades in the span of about a year in the implementation and use of technology to operate courts and continue to dispense justice. One major change that many have witnessed is the increased use of webcam conferencing for court hearings, often on Zoom. Zoom hearings have brought on a host of new challenges for everyone involved in a case and have led to calls of unconstitutionality and misconduct.

Original Case Details

In a recent New Jersey Restraining Order (RO) case, a man sought an RO against a woman after they broke up from dating. It was alleged that the woman went to the man's house after midnight along with four other men demanding the return of a dog that was currently the subject of an ownership dispute. Here, the judge conducted a final restraining order hearing on Zoom, and neither party was represented by an attorney and ultimately granted a final RO against the woman. On appeal, the woman claimed her due process rights were violated when the man had his mother in the room with him during his testimony and was coaching him off-camera. The RO was eventually reversed on appeal due to the violations.

Due Process Rights a Defendant Has at an RO Hearing

A defendant has all of the same rights at a live RO hearing as he or she does at a Zoom RO hearing. It is important to have an attorney representing you as you may not even realize what rights are being violated until it is too late, as it was with the case described above. A defendant at an RO hearing has the right to be represented by an attorney and also has rights under court procedure and the rules of evidence. The main rule violated by the case above was the judge's failure to sequester witnesses, a practice that aims to prevent coaching or witnesses tailoring their testimony to fit the testimony of the witness that they just observed testifying. In a Zoom trial, the judge has less ability to control the environment where a witness testifies, and in turn, opens the potential for legal violations. In a regular court, a judge will simply have any witnesses that need to be sequestered removed from the courtroom during testimony. Zoom court requires judges to take extra measures to ensure due process is followed.

Why Hiring the Lento Law Firm is the Right Choice

If you are facing a restraining order or criminal hearing over Zoom, then it is important to speak to an experienced attorney. Attorney Joseph D. Lento has helped ensure due process for countless clients across New Jersey. Attorney Lento and his team at the Lento Law Firm will fight for your rights and for the best possible outcome. Call the Lento Law Firm today at 888-535-3686 to learn why hiring Attorney Lento and his team are the right choice to defend you.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients in criminal courtrooms in New Jersey and nationwide. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. With unparalleled experience occupying several roles in the criminal justice system outside of being an attorney, Joseph D. Lento can give you valuable behind-the-scenes insight as to what is happening during all phases of the legal process. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in New Jersey and New York, and is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide. In the courtroom and in life, attorney Joseph D. Lento stands up when the bell rings!


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

​​​Contact The Lento Law Firm Today

When it comes to criminal defense cases, you need the right person in your corner. To learn more about how Mr. Lento can help you, call the Lento Law Firm today at 888-535-3686. or contact him online.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.