Blog

When Can Schools Search Student, And Is Evidence Admissible In Court?

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Nov 09, 2024 | 0 Comments

School searches may result in criminal charges when they uncover evidence of a crime. However, in New Jersey, the admissibility of that evidence depends on a few things, such as who conducts the search. Regardless of the situation, they are serious matters, and if your student is subject to one at their New Jersey school, call the Lento Law Firm at 888-535-3686 or fill out our consultation form now.

School Searches Under Federal and State Law

Under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, individuals (including students) have protection against unlawful searches and seizures. However, courts recognize that the circumstances under which schools conduct searches differ from those carried out by law enforcement.

The 1985 Supreme Court case, New Jersey v T.L.O., created a more lenient standard for school officials to search student property. Before the case, school officials—teachers, principals, and other administrators—needed “probable cause” like police do to search students. However, the Court decreed that schools only need to have “reasonable suspicion” to do so.

Critically, a search meets the Fourth Amendment standard of reasonable search if:

  • The search is properly initiated: School officials must have “reasonable grounds” for suspecting that the search will reveal evidence that the student has violated school rules or local laws.
  • The search is permitted in scope: The act is reasonably related to the search objectives and may not be “excessively intrusive” in light of the student's age, sex, gender, and the nature of the infraction.

New Jersey law also tracks federal law. The New Jersey State Constitution protects against “unreasonable searches and seizures,” which are not warranted unless probable cause is established, which translates to reasonable suspicion on school grounds.

Types of School Searches and Factors That Impact the Evidence Admissibility

In New Jersey, the admissibility of evidence obtained in a school search depends on who conducted it. Below are a few examples of what happens when various parties conduct searches and what is held against a student when criminal charges arise.

  • Searches by School Officials: If a teacher, principal, or other school authority has reasonable suspicion and conducts a search that is not excessively intrusive, any evidence produced is admissible in court.
  • Searches by Law Enforcement: If police or a School Resource Officer (SRO) are present, even if only in an advisory capacity, the admissibility standard increases to probable cause unless exigent circumstances are present.
  • Collaborative Searches: When school officials act with law enforcement in performing a search, a New Jersey court will look to determine whether the school acted autonomously or as a function of law enforcement. If performing a search at the request of, or in cooperation with, law enforcement, the probable cause standard is typically prescribed.

In a situation where a teacher is tipped off that a student has drugs in their locker, and they conduct a search and find drugs, the evidence is admissible for later charges under the guise that it was conducted under reasonable suspicion. However, if an SRO receives the same tip and conducts a search without establishing probable cause, any evidence uncovered is inadmissible due to a Fourth Amendment violation. The same is true if police direct a principal to conduct a search without reaching probable cause to do so.

How Can the Lento Law Firm Help?

Our team of attorneys understands that school authorities, SROs, and other law enforcement personnel may infringe upon a student's rights when uncovering evidence of alleged crimes and rule violations. But students don't leave their rights at home when they attend New Jersey schools and deserve every opportunity to a strong defense.

If your student faces a school search, the Lento Law Firm is a valuable resource to explain how the particulars of their case can affect the outcome, including whether evidence is admissible or not. Moreover, we will uphold their rights throughout every step, from school grievance procedures to criminal charges in the courtroom. To learn more, call the Lento Law Firm at 888-535-3686 or fill out our consultation form now.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients in criminal courtrooms in New Jersey and nationwide. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. With unparalleled experience occupying several roles in the criminal justice system outside of being an attorney, Joseph D. Lento can give you valuable behind-the-scenes insight as to what is happening during all phases of the legal process. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in New Jersey and New York, and is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide. In the courtroom and in life, attorney Joseph D. Lento stands up when the bell rings!

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Comments have been disabled.

​​​Contact The Lento Law Firm Today

When it comes to criminal defense cases, you need the right person in your corner. To learn more about how Mr. Lento can help you, call the Lento Law Firm today at 888-535-3686. or contact him online.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu