New Jersey Child Pornography Charges: When 1,000 Files Is Way Too Many

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Dec 14, 2022 | 0 Comments

Recent press reports the Middlesex County arrest of nine individuals on New Jersey child pornography charges after a lengthy investigation. The county's Internet Crimes Against Children Unit made the arrests with investigation help from the State Police and other county investigation units. According to the press report, prosecutors charged the arrested defendants with various state child pornography crimes, including distribution, storage, and leading a child pornography network. Curiously, though, prosecutors charged several defendants with possessing fewer than 1,000 pornography files but one defendant with possessing more than 1,000 files. The contrasting charges show what a difference a few more files can make to the seriousness of the charges and potential outcomes.

Leading a Child Pornography Network

New Jersey treats a basic child pornography charge as child endangerment under New Jersey Stat. 2C:24-4. Anyone responsible for the care of a child “who engages in sexual conduct which would impair or debauch the morals of the child” faces such a charge. But the offense level can significantly increase under New Jersey Stat. 2C:24:4.1 when the defendant leads a child pornography network maintaining large numbers of depictions of unlawful child sexual activity. Then, the number of depiction files can make a huge difference to the offense level and penalty outcome. The statute states plainly,

“Leader of a child pornography network is a crime of the first degree if the offense involves 100,000 or more items depicting the sexual exploitation or abuse of a child; a crime of the second degree if the offense involves at least 1,000 but less than 100,000 items depicting the sexual exploitation or abuse of a child; and a crime of the third degree if the offense involves less than 1,000 items depicting the sexual exploitation or abuse of a child.”

Offense Levels Make a Difference

Under New Jersey Stat. 2C:24:4.1, the number of child pornography files thus means the difference between a first, second, or third-degree offense. And those offense levels make a big difference in the potential sentence. New Jersey ordinarily punishes a third-degree offense with up to five years in prison. A second-degree offense jumps to five to ten years in prison, while a first-degree offense carries a sentence of ten to twenty years in prison. Both the potential minimums and maximums increase with each offense level. Computers can hold a lot of files with great user ease and little user effort. Beware of any child pornography file while also knowing that 1,000 such files are far too many.

Retain premier New Jersey criminal defense attorney Joseph D. Lento and the Lento Law Firm's Criminal Defense Team if you face New Jersey child pornography or other criminal charges. Call 888.535.3686 or go online now.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients in criminal courtrooms in New Jersey and nationwide. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. With unparalleled experience occupying several roles in the criminal justice system outside of being an attorney, Joseph D. Lento can give you valuable behind-the-scenes insight as to what is happening during all phases of the legal process. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in New Jersey and New York, and is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide. In the courtroom and in life, attorney Joseph D. Lento stands up when the bell rings!


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

​​​Contact The Lento Law Firm Today

When it comes to criminal defense cases, you need the right person in your corner. To learn more about how Mr. Lento can help you, call the Lento Law Firm today at 888-535-3686. or contact him online.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.